Wednesday, 14 May 2025

Looking at War

 Which countries have always waged war for a long time now since the middle of the 20th century? 


The United States of America has chalked up the most in number of wars participated, starting with the Korean Peninsular War in the early 1950s.  An ironic fact is that such military episodes have never taken place on homesoil in mainland America. 

The USA military and government have mostly dabbled themselves and their arnaments in the Middle East - Libya, Iraq, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Yemen and Lebanon come to mind.    The cauldron of aggression, conflict, geopolitical tensions and social disorder sparked off by the establishment of the state of Israel have seen fights with her neighbours.  And the USA government is a dominant supporter of Israel.

The Cold War turned out to be varying degrees of heightened tensions, a game of high stakes who will blink first  and almost shaving near close encounters of military outbreaks.   The main protagonists were the Soviet Union and the USA, with the circle of accompanying allies.

The break up of the Federation of Yugoslavia in the 1990s arose from long brewing domestic differences.  United Nations sent personnel to be involved in the intracacies and complexities, thereby causing foreign troops to step in a stage beset with the divide between Eastern and Western Europe.

The Falklands Isles in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean witnessed the determination of Margaret Thatcher and Britain to not let a strategic colonial outpost be lost.  The confrontation with Argentina could have been the last fought battle of the British Empire's military tradition.

New Zealand has not experienced military mayhem domestically since the wars of attrition between the Maoris and the British colonists in thd early 19th century, leading to the Treaty of Waitangi.

Contemporary India and Pakistan have had limited skirmishes - and so have India and China on the Himalayan border, plus that between Vietnam and China.  China's last major war participation has been in the Korean Peninsular in a proxy conflict between Communists and capitalists.

Which European nations have not gone into battle since the end of World War 2?
Amazingly, most of the European continent has undergone peaceful political processes under the advent of the EU.  The Ukraine question escalated in the third decade of the 21st century with still an unresolved and continuing military conflict.  Historical fears and sentiment still run through the instinctive geopolitics of the European continent.

Most continents have never been invaded by foreign powers since the end of the colonialism period.   " Invasion"  these days can be more in the form of commercialism, soft power, financial domination, technology advancement and trade prowess, rather than in physical military wars.  However, colonies, albeit of small size, still exist around the world - we reflect on the possesions by the French in the South Pacific.  On the other hand, large nations like Canada and Australia still have Governor-Generals representing the ultimate authority of the British Monarch over their lands.

Which contemporary nations have somehow retained their viable independence amidst the rolling waves of human tribal conflict and war?  Thailand and Ethopia were never colonised when most of the world were.

Which nation has often joined others in warfare, and in the name of the another country leading the war, despite of almost never being attacked before?  Australia, India, New Zealand and Canada had sacrificed many in the war effort led by Britain and the USA since the beginning of the 20th century.

Which region of the world has attracted the most invaders in modern times since 1945?   Perhaps it is the Middle East.
Evolving disorders have broken out domestically in societies there  as a consequence of dictatorships, religious based groups, people's revolutions and interference by foreign governments.

Central Africa had its share of turbulence
due to economic inequity, warlord dominancs, burgeoning populatons and claims over resources.   War has even been declared between El Salvador and Honduras in 1969 over the results of a football match in Central America.

All nations in South east Asia have been attacked and invaded by the Japanese Imperial Army during World War 2.  Which nations in present day ASEAN have managed to experience predominant lack of warfare since then?

Singapore, Brunei, the Phillippines, the Federation of Malaysia and Thailand have been fortunate to not have serious epispdes of warfare in recent history.   Indonesia had battles in Irian Jaya (western half of Papua New Guinea) and when fighting the Portuguese ruled Timor-Leste in the latter's war for independence.

Indo-China was quagmired in atrocious warfare as the Communists fought intense nationalistic struggles in Vietnam and Laos.  Kampuchea was taken over by a cruel regime under Pol Pot.  Myanmar continues under military rule and its central government fights the armies of several different ethnic groups in major portions of the country, apart from facing rebellions within the Burmese cohort.

What lies for the near future in the 21st century?   Will ideology continue to stir up the masses?  Are democratic styled elections a sham subject to manipulation, misinformation and huge monies controlled by a few individuals?  Will conflicts still arise because of significant fights over trade and resources?  Will the ideal human values overwhelm the human tribal instinct to fight?

The quality of specific leaders who hold the upper hand in world affairs can be so important.   Do politicians choose between the welfare of their human denizens and the tempting short term way to massive business opportunities and wealth?  The core generation of voters can decide the path but powerful people can pull the puppet strings.   War has always been waged by older politicians making use of younger people to do the actual fighting.

#yongkevthoughts

Monday, 12 May 2025

The On Screen Electronic Divide

 It has been like trampling through the jungle.


Accounts, apps, email addresses, websites and more cry out for your passwords.   Some insist on a specific set of characters, caps, punctuation and numbers.  The more careful entities do a two factor authentication.   Airlines and banks provide electronic fingermark access.  Others send a one time use six digit pin to your nominated mobile telephone number.

And yet the fraudsters and scammers are lurking in the bush.

Out in the wild world are people using online love lures.  Victims usually have not met their scam better half in person face to face - and depend on messages, electronic photos and online voices.  I am confused, don't you think you want to feel a budding lover in the flesh first in any serious relationship?

There may be a rising tendency for on screen commercial transactions to avoid meeting the other side.  We are not interested to meet the cook in our food deliveries.  We get our payments from human beings we are not interested to know.   So many consumers only interact with the middle broker or deliverer - or maybe not.  Even parcels are just left at your nominated place and the deliverer simply takes a photograph of where he or she left it.

House recipients put up front door cameras with apps on phones.   Gone are the days that we get a chance to chat with service people.   Is it because human beings are so entangled with other things that they cannot wait for a delivery?   Yet we patiently wait for the arrival of the plumber, electrician, gardener and tradie.

There used to be someone home to receive things.   Now they can go to lockers in shopping centres.  Oh yes, the traditional local post office is gone.   Fancy cafes are more popular in suburbs - and everyone perhaps goes there on  a regular basis more than any other place.  Cafes can play another role as collection centres, more than newsagents.  

Online commerce has spiked to such proportions that the cardboard and materials used to pack parcels are becoming a menacing disposal matter. 
Some deliveries still insist on a signature by the recipient - and the seller just wants any form of mark, not a proper personalised signature, as proof of receipt.

How do we get satisfied that we are actually interacting with kosher and authentic other parties online?

As online consumers, we are always challenged that we are not robots.   We hardly get to authenticate parties on the other side of the electronic interface.   It truly feels like a one sided way of we always having to prove ourselves in an electronic transaction.

#yongkevthoughts

Friday, 9 May 2025

Numbers 2025

 In 2025:


Narendra Modi rules over 1.46 billion across India.

Xi Jin Ping presides over 1.424 billion across China.

Pope Leo XIV heads over 1.4 billion Catholics across the world.

The European Union has 449 million in an emerging political union of still rather independent states.

Donald Trump is President over 340 million people across the USA.

Indonesia's 294 million people currently have President Prabowo Subianto.

Pakistan has 255 million people under President Asif Ali Zardari.

Nigeria has 238 million residents in a country ruled by Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Brazil has 213 million people currently ruled by Luis Inacio Lula da Silva.

Bangladesh, located beside India and Myanmar, with 175 million people, currently has a caretaker government under Prime Minister Muhammad Yunus.

Russia has 146 million residents across a nation presided by Vladimir Putin.

Japan with 123 million people currently has Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru.

The Phillippines has a population of 121 million under President Bong Bong Marcos Junior.

#yongkevthoughts


Thursday, 8 May 2025

Clutter

 Clutter.....

Unknowingly.  Without any intention
.  They seem to creep up.  Before the sweeping conquest of most things online, clutter was more tangible, more physical, more visible.

It was one of the two times a calendar year we could leave things beside the pavement for Council services to collect
and dispose for us ratepayers.

Not everything, there are guidelines of what we can throw.  No chemicals, oils, paints, computer devices, toxic things, nothing too large.   Small furniture, mattresses, lawn mowers, kitchen gadgets, metal and pails seem okay.

How did households accumulate such items?  Once  they were useful, many times they were loved, always they provided joy.  Perhaps the original users and owners had moved on.   Maybe they had exceeded their useful life.  Many could have borne scars of peeled paint, loose screws and damaged corners.

When the items were removed, most likely from where they had been sitting for so many years now, a space was freed up.   The vibes of space and energy can move to a more positive stance when things that are hardly used are finally removed.

Why have such items been still kept but no longer used?    Are owners hanging on to sentimental memory or plan to use them again in the near future?   Everyone of us have wardrobe items from the past that we have not worn for a while.   We can have treasured books in our personal library that we read long ago.   Before wifi came and took over our lives, we had physical media in tangible storage for entertainment. Each of us have souvenirs from enjoyable tours.   

As baby boomers live longer, as houses become empty nests due to migration of the younger generations and as family elders downsize, the question of clutter and the need to dispose of household items can rear its ugly reality.

Every individual has silo interests echoed in personal possessions.

What is a person's treasure can be another's garbage.   What was lovingly cared for daily can become disposable in the eyes of another.

There can be a comfort zone in keeping something or not.   In a family scenario, will younger generations still keep the items valued by parents?   Will a spouse have the same cherished mindset over specific items prioritised by the other half?

Human beings are born with no attached material belongings - and so likewise when they pass on.  The human penchant for attachment especially to material things is how civilisation  and society have conditioned us.  Letting go of things is a trying process.    Over attachment leads to the accumulation of clutter.

Other people may call it clutter, but what we hold on to can represent our efforts, devotion and time spent in building them up.  It is essential to understand this perspective.   Then only can third parties comprehend the strong attachment of persons to things that cannot be let go of.

Clutter has emerged in cyberspace -  on screen records, documentation, images, videos and graphics for example.   As these are not that in the face physical, we may not fully recognise the extent of such clutter - until we run out of online capacity in our devices.

Everyone of us faces the responsibilityto manage clutter of whatever kind.  Is it much better that we control, manage and decide on matters of our own clutter?

Amidst the so called clutter, there can
be hidden gems.  The question then becomes when and to whom does the realisation of such hidden gems occur.

#yongkevthoughts

Friday, 2 May 2025

When It Is Fraud

 "i have not lost my memory, but I still do not seem to remember". So goes a line from an old British movie.


When asked to respond to concerns of the serious lack of competition in the supermarket sector across Australia, a representative of the business sector is said to proudly state that " but they are making profits to serve investors".

I cannot see the humour and logic in such pronouncements that miss the essential point.  More of such publicly made statements can be heard from those in authority, to detract and distract from issues they cannot explain.

"The exact contrary of what is generally believed is often the truth."
(Jean de la Bruyere)

"Our ability to manufacture fraud now exceeds our ability to detect it." ( Al Pacino).

Albert Camus once stated
'Truth, like light, blinds. Falsehood, on the contrary, is a beautiful twilight that enhances every object."

"Fraud is the daughter of Greed." ( John Grant)

"Force and fraud are, in war, the two cardinal virtues.”
— Thomas Hobbes

"The first and worst of all frauds is to cheat one's self. All sin is easy after that."
(Pearl Bailey)

"If you see fraud and do not say fraud, you are a fraud."
-  Nassim Nicholas Taleb

"If it is too good to be true, it is probably a fraud."  (Ron Weber)

In Australia, there is more legal requirement to ensure truth when selling toilet paper in advertisements, than when in flagging political ads.

Whether it is in the context of business, politics, government service, communication media or international initiatives,  each of us must observe the words and actions who promise one thing and enact another. 

Confucius can have the final say.
"Look not at what is contrary to propriety; listen not to what is contrary to propriety; speak not what is contrary to
propriety;
make no movement which is contrary to propriety."

#yongkevthoughts

1400 in 16 years

  This is my 1400th write up for this blog. To every one of you who have followed and read my posts even once, occasionally or all this whil...