Testing for a Most Important Thing

What if there is a viable test carried out to detect manipulation of truth and fact, as if it was a Covid detection test?

In the past 2 years or so, so many swabs have been applied on so many of our fellow residents. The process, outcomes and the science of such swabs are not accurate all the time, as there can be resulting false positives or false negatives.

In assessing whether What if there is a viable test carried out to detect manipulation of truth and fact, as if it was a Covid detection test?

In the past 2 years or so, so many swabs have been applied on so many of our fellow residents. The process, outcomes and the science of such swabs are not accurate all the time, as there can be resulting false positives or false negatives.

In assessing whether individuals in positions of public responsibility, across several societies, are sincere in telling us what they know, or do not know, or just unsure about, we do not require chemical analysis - only our previous experience in looking at, sensing, or reading enough, into whether someone or some media channel is developing a long nose like Pinnochio.

The circumstantial and embedded framework also is significant. Is a company, public official or journalist having a hidden or obvious agenda? Are pronouncements changing throughout time, without a sufficient explanation given to us? Are specific things over emphasised, with other pertinent matters strangely not mentioned? Is the

speaker or writer What if there is a viable test carried out to detect manipulation of truth and fact, as if it was a Covid detection test?

What if there is a viable test carried out to detect manipulation of truth and fact, as if it was a Covid detection test?

In the past 2 years or so, so many swabs have been applied on so many of our fellow residents. The process, outcomes and the science of such swabs are not accurate all the time, as there can be resulting false positives or false negatives.

In assessing whether individuals in positions of public responsibility, across several societies, are sincere in telling us what they know, or do not know, or just unsure about, we do not require chemical analysis - only our previous experience in looking at, sensing, or reading enough, into whether someone or some media channel is developing a long nose like Pinnochio.

The circumstantial and embedded framework also is significant. Is a company, public official or journalist having a hidden or obvious agenda? Are pronouncements changing throughout time, without a sufficient explanation given to us? Are specific things over emphasised, with other pertinent matters strangely not mentioned? Is the

speaker or writer cherry picking things, without considering a balance of other things? Are facts and truths trodden under opinions and observations? Are skewed personal or group views dressed up as imperative information and data?

Freedom of expression, or the lack of it, in a society can be misused to dominate what authorities want us to hear or believe. On the other end of the information spectrum are practices of redaction, omission and limitation under made up excuses of privacy, national security and selective protections.

Statistics and numeral figures can be chucked at us without providing definitions and conditions of how the figures were arrived at.

The art and science of identifying truths, untruths and anything in between is more enjoyable, fulfiling and instinctive than any swab test to detect antibodies to a serious infectious malaise. the past 2 years or so, so many swabs have been applied on so many of our fellow residents. The process, outcomes and the science of such swabs are not accurate all the time, as there can be resulting false positives or false negatives.

In assessing whether individuals in positions of public responsibility, across several societies, are sincere in telling us what they know, or do not know, or just unsure about, we do not require chemical analysis - only our previous experience in looking at, sensing, or reading enough, into whether someone or some media channel is developing a long nose like Pinnochio.

The circumstantial and embedded framework also is significant. Is a company, public official or journalist having a hidden or obvious agenda? Are pronouncements changing throughout time, without a sufficient explanation given to us? Are specific things over emphasised, with other pertinent matters strangely not mentioned? Is the

speaker or writer cherry picking things, without considering a balance of other things? Are facts and truths trodden under opinions and observations? Are skewed personal or group views dressed up as imperative information and data?

Freedom of expression, or the lack of it, in a society can be misused to dominate what authorities want us to hear or believe. On the other end of the information spectrum are practices of redaction, omission and limitation under made up excuses of privacy, national security and selective protections.

Statistics and numeral figures can be chucked at us without providing definitions and conditions of how the figures were arrived at.

The art and science of identifying truths, untruths and anything in between is more enjoyable, fulfiling and instinctive than any swab test to detect antibodies to a serious infectious malaise. picking things, without considering a balance of other things? Are facts and truths trodden under opinions and observations? Are skewed personal or group views dressed up as imperative information and data?

Freedom of expression, or the lack of it, in a society can be misused to dominate what authorities want us to hear or believe. On the other end of the information spectrum are practices of redaction, omission and limitation under made up excuses of privacy, national security and selective protections.

Statistics and numeral figures can be chucked at us without providing definitions and conditions of how the figures were arrived at.

The art and science of identifying truths, untruths and anything in between is more enjoyable, fulfiling and instinctive than any swab test to detect antibodies to a serious infectious malaise. in positions of public responsibility, across several societies, are sincere in telling us what they know, or do not know, or just unsure about, we do not require chemical analysis - only our previous experience in looking at, sensing, or reading enough, into whether someone or some media channel is developing a long nose like Pinnochio.

The circumstantial and embedded framework also is significant. Is a company, public official or journalist having a hidden or obvious agenda? Are pronouncements changing throughout time, without a sufficient explanation given to us? Are specific things over emphasised, with other pertinent matters strangely not mentioned? Is the

speaker or writer cherry picking things, without considering a balance of other things? Are facts and truths trodden under opinions and observations? Are skewed personal or group views dressed up as imperative information and data?

Freedom of expression, or the lack of it, in a society can be misused to dominate what authorities want us to hear or believe. On the other end of the information spectrum are practices of redaction, omission and limitation under made up excuses of privacy, national security and selective protections.

Statistics and numeral figures can be chucked at us without providing definitions and conditions of how the figures were arrived at.

The art and science of identifying truths, untruths and anything in between is more enjoyable, fulfiling and instinctive than any swab test to detect antibodies to a serious infectious malaise.